Capability

Ship it, and know what shipped

Run your existing deploy scripts, watch the output live, and get a straight answer about whether it worked.

Your existing deploy scripts Bash PowerShell Batch Docker and Compose nginx and IIS Linux and Windows servers Bare-server first deploys

In your words

Ask it like this

No syntax to learn. These are real requests, phrased the way people actually phrase them.

›deploy the latest to staging ›this server is brand new, get the app live on it ›why did the deploy fail last night ›what actually shipped in the last deploy ›run the deploy script but show me what it does first ›copy the staging setup to the new box, keep its own settings

Capability

What it does here

Everything below is what the agent does today, not a roadmap.

Runs the deploy scripts you already have, with no rewrite and no new pipeline to learn
Live streaming output, so a long build is never a silent spinner
Reads the failure and tells you the cause instead of blaming the launcher
Sets up a bare server from scratch when there is nothing to deploy onto yet
Clone an environment safely: copy configs on the server, change only the keys that differ
Every destructive step is confirmation-gated and written to an audit log

What it looks like

One question, one answer, one fix

The checks on the left of each reply are the reads it did before committing to an answer. That is the difference between a diagnosis and a guess.

Every exchange ends in a verified outcome. It goes back and confirms the result rather than assuming the fix worked.

brynko devOps Agent

deploy the latest to staging

read the project found your deploy script checked the server

Your deploy script is in the project and staging is reachable. It builds the image, stops the old container, starts the new one and reloads nginx. Four steps, about two minutes. Want me to run it?

go ahead

streamed the run container replaced site responded

Finished in 1 minute 52. The new container is running, nginx reloaded cleanly, and staging is returning 200. The old container is stopped rather than removed, so rolling back is quick if you need it.

Deployed · staging healthy

Common cases

The ones that cost you an afternoon

Each of these is a specific failure with a specific set of checks behind it, not a general promise to help.

The deploy script failed and the output is gone

It ran, something broke, and the terminal that had the output is closed. Running it again either works for no clear reason or fails the same way.

What it does. Output is streamed and kept, so the failure is still there to read afterwards. It reads the actual error rather than reporting that the script exited non-zero.

Only one person can deploy

The steps live in one engineer's head, so releases queue behind whoever knows the order and the gotchas.

What it does. Anyone asks in plain language, the plan is shown before anything runs, and every step is visible as it happens. The knowledge stops being a single point of failure.

The server is brand new

There is nothing to deploy onto yet, so the first release means an afternoon of setup before any code moves.

What it does. It installs what the project needs, sets up the web server, moves the app across and issues the certificate, showing you the whole plan before step one.

It said success but the site is unchanged

The script exits zero, and yet the old version is still being served.

What it does. It confirms afterwards rather than trusting the exit code: what is actually running, whether the service restarted, and whether the site responds.

Setting up a second environment

A new environment means copying a working one and carefully changing the parts that differ, which is exactly where mistakes hide.

What it does. It copies the configuration on the server and changes only the keys that should differ, showing you a diff of each one before writing.

Nobody remembers what changed

Something broke this afternoon and the only way to know what shipped is to ask around.

What it does. Every action, who approved it and what came back is written to an audit log, so the question has an answer instead of a guess.

Start to finish

What happens between the question and the fix

You say what you want shipped
Which project, which server. No new pipeline syntax and nothing to migrate.
It reads the project first
Including the deploy script you already have, so it works with your process rather than replacing it.
You see the plan before step one
Every step listed up front, and each command shown as it comes.
It runs, with the output live
A long build is never a silent spinner, and if a step fails you see the real error rather than an exit code.
It confirms what shipped
Then checks the result: the service is running, the site responds, and the audit log records what happened.

The part that matters

Reading is free. Changing asks first.

Reads run instantly and need no permission, because reading cannot break anything. Anything that changes a system, whether that is a restart, an edit, an install or a delete, stops and tells you what it is about to change, on which server, and why. You see it written out, as the command it will run or a red and green diff of the file, so you are approving the actual thing rather than a description of it. Changes are backed up first, so undoing one is a click.

Read the security model

Questions

Deployments, specifically

Do I have to change how we deploy?

No. It runs the deploy scripts you already have. There is no new pipeline to adopt, no YAML to rewrite, and nothing to install on the server. If your process works, it keeps working.

Does it replace our CI pipeline?

No, and it is not trying to. If you have CI, keep it. This covers the parts around it: the first deploy onto a bare server, the release that failed at 5pm, and the environment nobody has set up before.

Can it deploy without asking me?

No. You see the plan before anything starts and each step before it runs. On a system that earns money, an unattended deploy is a risk we did not want to offer.

What if the deploy fails halfway?

It stops and tells you which step failed and what the error was, with the output still on screen. It will not carry on hoping the next step fixes it.

Can it set up a server that has nothing on it?

Yes. That is the longest path it handles: installing what the project needs, setting up the web server, moving the app across, and issuing the certificate, with the full plan shown before it starts.

Is there a record of what was deployed?

Yes. Every action, the approval and the result are written to an audit log you can read, which is usually the fastest answer to "what changed this afternoon".

Also covered

The rest of the stack

Ask your database what is wrong

Read-only checks and queries over your existing SSH connection, with credentials encrypted at rest.

Wildcard HTTPS, sorted in one step

Issue trusted, auto-renewing certificates, wildcards included, and get the paths handed straight back.

Your AWS account, in plain English

Read EC2, S3, Elastic IPs and EBS, spot what is quietly costing you money, and make changes only after you approve them.

Ask Jenkins what went wrong

Read jobs, builds, the queue and console logs, find out why a build failed, and trigger or stop builds with your approval.

It runs on your machine too

Build, run and fix projects on your own computer, including installing the runtime the project needs.

A real file editor for your Linux servers, no nano required

Browse your Linux servers as a file tree and edit files in a real editor with syntax highlighting, find and replace and search across the whole box. Over the SSH access you already have, with nothing installed on the server.

Try it on something that already annoys you

Point it at one server. You will know within an hour whether it earns its place.

Create an account See pricing